Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Salvatore Caruso vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Caruso vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Salvatore Caruso vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caruso has won 49.53% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 49.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caruso, in recent form, has won 56.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 49.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.43% and 32.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Caruso has saved 52.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 62.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Caruso has won 48.33% of matches played (W/L 29/ 31), with Jong winning 58.62% (W/L 34/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 253/ 197), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Caruso has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.03% of matches (W/L 16/ 23), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caruso winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Caruso winning 2 and Jong winning 1. The last match between Caruso and Jong was at the Tenerife 2 Challenger, 21-02-2024, Second, Hard with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Caruso and Jong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Caruso winning 1 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Caruso winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caruso has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.37 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 336.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caruso has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Caruso has converted 49.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 45.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Caruso 1 - 0 Jong
382
Rank
76
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
162
Rank
135
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
54% (417-355)
Career Total W/L
62% (221-135)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
57% (17-13)
$927,160
Career Prize Money
$320,415
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:39 | 2:8:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (37/72) | 70% (55/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 73% (40/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (22/35) | 38% (9/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (30/79) | 33% (24/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 57% (17/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (23/26) | 54% (39/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (215/220) | 52% (350/319) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 56% (10/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 151 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:48 | 1:51:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.21 | 331.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (734/1315) | 60% (1287/2160) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (482/734) | 71% (915/1287) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (285/581) | 50% (435/873) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (68/140) | 46% (86/187) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (558/1351) | 39% (815/2086) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 54% (14/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 20% (15/3) |
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Timofey Skatov
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Petr Nouza
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Marcello Serafini
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Caruso Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
